Relijournal > Religion

Being Criticed For The Gospel

Many of us have been criticized for the gospel but be careful least we become the one criticizing.

Page 1 of 2 | Prev 12Next»

I think it is interesting that when someone takes the banner of Christ and holds it high today in an "unusual" sense they come under fire. Over my nearly 60 years I have seen this in many settings.

In the 40-50's the Pentecostals held meetings in tents, fire halls, warehouses and homes and won many to the Lord. I was there, I know first hand. In those days you didn't have to be good to go to a Pentecostal Church. Anyone could come. People with problems came. They met Jesus. Lives were changed. And I saw the results. Let's call it good fruit. The traditional church preached against them because they didn't follow their guidelines. After all, a pastor had to wear a suit with a backwards collar and the Pentecostals didn't. I know of at least one preacher of that time who wore his best bib overalls to church, that was all he had. What's more, how could a fire hall be consecrated and used as a church? They played bingo there on Thursday night. Many of these groups met where they could find a place. Some of them were “put out of the temple” so to speak by the organized religious leaders. Others were from the highways and byways. They weren't churched but they had been with Jesus. It is interesting that this was said of the early church that the leaders took note that they have been with Jesus.

The Charismatics of the 60's were attacked by the traditional churches for the same reason those churches attacked the Pentecostals ten years before. After all, many of them left the traditional churches to find a closer walk with God. Worse, many of the Pentecostals decried the Charismatics because they didn't join them or do it their way. It was “older brother syndrome” gone to seed. But by then many of the Pentecostal groups had grown up, gotten sophisticated and exclusive. You had to be good to go there to church. You had to follow all the rules of the denomination or non-denomination. Some of their pastors even wore their collars backward! Many of these rules were man-made. Many of the Charismatics came from churches that allowed social drinking, an anathema in the Pentecostal groups. They knew a person couldn't be a Christian if they drank even a drop of alcohol. Even taking cough syrup with alcoholic content or using rubbing alcohol made you suspect. It was Carry Nation syndrome gone to seed. Although I have strong aversion to drinking I don't consider it the unpardonable sin and if done in moderation and in a way to not harm others it isn't a sin at all. I don't drink because I might cause some to stumble if I did. But this little thing created a big rift. Rather than showing the high road of love Pentecostals showed a low road of ostracism. The traditional churches for the most part gave the Charismatics the left foot of fellowship and the Pentecostals didn't put out a welcome mat for them.

While this was going on there was another group that was forming that was referred to as the Evangelicals. They left the traditional churches for about the same reason, and they were treated about the same as the Charismatics. I am not as familiar with these so I will mention the briefly only to recognize the groups I will talk about were not alone.

The Pentecostals and Organized Charismatics attacked the Word and Faith people in the late 70's and 80's, long before the “name it and claim it” cult surfaced. After all, these upstarts were teaching a message to get back to God's word and that flew in the face of accepting the Denomination specified doctrine they had developed. The word and faith movement for me was nothing more than a getting back to the solid bible teaching the Pentecostals followed in the late 40's and early 50's but strayed from as they got sophisticated and 'improved' on the gospel. I can remember an article in the official magazine of one large Charismatic denomination about April 1980 that was strongly against the faith groups. An aside here, groups that concentrate on the written word without the spirit become legalistic. Those who concentrate on the spirit without the written word get flakey. There is balance and the faith and word movements held pretty well for about 15 years and then started to take a nasty left turn.

All of these attacked the Prophetic in the late 80's and early 90's. The main reason for this was they weren't doing it their way. After all, the older brother has the right to dictate policy.

Page 1 of 2 | Prev 12Next»
0
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
Introduction to the Gospel According to John  |  A Cloud of Witnesses
Comments (0)
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Post comment with your Triond credentials?
Inside Relijournal

Buddhism

 /

Christianity

 /

Hinduism

 /

Islam

 /

Judaism

 /

Paganism

 /

Religion


Popular Tags
Popular Writers
Powered by
Relijournal
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.